Skip to main content
New Download the free Source-to-Pay Buyer's Checklist - get the guide.
Case Study · Construction & EPC

Digitization of EPC Procurement

EPC tendering has more variants and validation rules than almost any other category. Here's how a three-pronged RFQ approach made procurEngine the preferred Source-to-Pay platform in the segment.

By Anupam Aggrwal · 28 July 2025

Preamble

As one element of the GDP, Government Spending (largely in Infrastructure) is the market for EPC companies. In the last several years the current government has focused on this leg of the GDP to grow the economy. This has led to good growth in the EPC sector of the industry and companies are battling the scale alongside new entrants who are putting extreme pressure on pricing.

Problem Statement

There are multiple varieties of tendering - Open, Closed, two-part Techno-Commercial, three part (2 part + PQ), four part (3 part + EMD), etc. - each with very specific workflows and validations, not designed well by most platforms.

Features like Pre-Bid and during-bid communication, PQ compliance, digital EMD collection and release, uploads & downloads at multiple stages, leaf node BOQs, etc. are not designed well on most platforms.

Solution

We took a three-pronged approach:

  • Standard RFQ module (all variants) on a multi-tenant configuration: One of the most popular in the industry, covering all the use cases in the standard business workflow followed by all mid & large companies. "Simple to use" is the core attribute, driving adoption by all users.
  • RFQ module on a "Private Instance" with customization to cater to multi-business groups and multi-business geographies.
  • Highly configurable RFQ module (self-configurable) with flexibility to use components like approval modules, notification modules, and create customized commercial libraries with formulae (e.g. imports, domestic, multi-currency etc.) with several advanced features.

Outcome

With the above approach we are able to meet the exact requirement of each category of EPC based on the segments they are operating in. This has made us the most preferred "Source to Pay" platform in the EPC segment.

Future Plan

Modules to digitize "Respond to Execute & Collect payments with Risk mitigations" are at various stages of development to strengthen our offering and help this segment digitize for scale, accuracy, and risk mitigation.

FAQ

Questions about this case study.

What makes EPC procurement different from standard procurement?
EPC tendering involves many specialized formats (open, closed, multi-part with PQ and EMD) with unique workflows that most generic platforms don't support well.
How did procurEngine address EPC-specific needs?
With a three-pronged approach: a standard multi-tenant RFQ module, a customizable private-instance module for multi-geography organizations, and a fully configurable self-service RFQ module.
What is planned next for EPC digitization?
Modules to digitize the execution and payment-collection cycle with risk mitigation features.

See more customer stories.

Explore Customers Book a Demo